Routes & Areas
Tips & Techniques
- Skiing
- Climbing
- Mountaineering
- General
Gear
Community
Members
Climbing Topics
Protection
Anchors Part 1
Anchors Part 2
Anchors Part 3
Rappel Backups
Rappel Devices
Guide Rap System
Tying Off The Belay

Climbing Protection System

Anchors Part 3
Artical Number:27
Overview: When building anchors, trade-offs and compromises are inevitable: few systems can be arranged perfectly. It is important not to lose sight of the broader perspectives of time, the amount and size/type of protection available, and realistic assessment of requirements. Beware of becoming involved in an engineering exercise when building anchors. The simplest, fastest solution is usually the best one.
Evaluation of Anchor Strength
The criteria used for evaluating anchor strength are:
• Evaluate the individual pieces of protection used in the anchor.
• Assess potential for multiplication of force.
• The amount of redundancy (that is, if one part of the anchor should fail, are there other parts available for back-up).
Evaluation of Pieces
The quality of all protection placements can be assessed by considering the following points:
• What size and type is the piece? All other factors being equal, larger and simpler pieces have greater structural strength.
• What is the quality of the material (e.g. rock, ice, snow) the piece is placed in? Some types of material are inherently stronger than others. Material quality in a given place may vary.
• What is the quality of the placement itself? A perfect fit, with large area of surface contact is ideal.
• Is there potential for multiplication of forces? Minimize force multiplication whenever possible.
• How well is the piece oriented in relation to the anticipated direction of force that will be applied? Multidirectional pieces may be required in some applications.
Multiplication Of Force
Multiplication of force should be minimized whenever possible in multi-point anchors. Placements in multi-point anchors can be oriented horizontally to one another or vertically. Vertical orientations more effectively distribute loads: the angle of the connecting slings is generally less thereby reducing potential vector forces.
 

  < Back to Climbing Skills < New Search

/ 403 678-2815
ACMG Professional Site: www.acmg.ca
© 2003 acmgguides.com